How should reviewers use Asset Optimization Platform?
Use Asset Optimization Platform as a governed reference term, then check the source records, confidence tier, and owner review state before treating it as operational evidence.
What must be reviewed before Asset Optimization Platform becomes evidence?
Relevant records include: Asset ID, hierarchy, class, site, criticality, status, BOM, parts, work orders, downtime, failure history, and optional condition context. The reviewer must also check source context, field meaning, and the stated ambiguity before action.
What ambiguity should reviewers check for Asset Optimization Platform?
Export-based asset diagnostics are not live APM, historian analytics, condition monitoring, or automated asset control.
Which Industrial IQ engine owns the primary relationship?
AssetMind AI is the primary engine. Supporting engines are used only when their evidence is substantively relevant: ReliabilityMind AI, ReadyMind AI.
What is outside the scope of this definition?
This definition describes a governed diagnostic concept. AI2COE does not treat it as a benchmark result, buyer-specific outcome evidence, certification, autonomous instruction, promised outcome, or ERP write-back action.