No ERP write-back
Diagnostics do not autonomously change SAP, Maximo, Oracle, EAM, CMMS, procurement, or inventory systems.
A public security review brief for enterprise buyers evaluating Industrial IQ diagnostics, upload lifecycle, source-file purge, access control, DPA/SLA support, SOC 2 roadmap, and no-write-back boundaries.
Icons are paired with visible labels and status tags. They summarize the control posture without replacing the detailed policy text below.
Diagnostics do not autonomously change SAP, Maximo, Oracle, EAM, CMMS, procurement, or inventory systems.
Industrial IQ evaluates exported operational data and produces review evidence before any buyer-controlled remediation.
Uploaded source files are used to generate report packs and are purged after report generation according to disclosed handling boundaries.
Confidence tiers and review queues separate evidence-ready findings from owner-review candidates.
Findings carry confidence context so buyers can distinguish strong evidence from review-required signals.
Open Findings, report ownership, continuity metadata, and audit events support governance where required.
DPA, engagement SLA, security overview, and procurement review language are available for buyer review.
AI2COE does not claim SOC 2 Type II certification; audit maturity remains a roadmap item until completed.
Industrial IQ is designed for read-only diagnostic evaluation. The first enterprise step is exported operational data, not production integration or autonomous remediation. Enterprise production controls, data residency, certification posture, and procurement terms require customer-specific review.
| Control area | Current posture | Buyer value | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| No ERP write-back | Industrial IQ starts from exported data and does not change SAP, Maximo, Oracle, EAM, CMMS, procurement, or inventory systems. | Reduces production-system change risk during diagnostic review. | Implemented |
| Export-first diagnostics | Buyers can begin with CSV/workbook exports rather than production integration. | Allows low-risk pilot evaluation before platform commitment. | Implemented |
| Human review | Findings are evidence for accountable owners to accept, reject, defer, or escalate. | Prevents uncontrolled operational action. | Implemented |
| Source-backed evidence | Findings include mapped fields, reason codes, source references, confidence, and report context. | Supports finance, operations, procurement, maintenance, and audit review. | Implemented |
| Access control | Protected workflows require authenticated account context; report ownership and access events are tracked. | Supports reviewer accountability and report control. | Implemented / review per engagement |
| Report ownership | Reports are tied to generating user and business context where applicable. | Clarifies who owns diagnostic evidence and follow-up. | Implemented |
| Source-file purge | Uploaded source files are processed to generate the diagnostic report pack and then purged. | Reduces standing source-file retention. | Implemented where diagnostic upload path applies |
| DPA | DPA language is available for diagnostic engagements and customer-specific review. | Supports legal and procurement due diligence. | Available during buyer review |
| SLA | Engagement SLA language is published for scoped diagnostic delivery. | Supports procurement and finance review. | Published |
| Audit trail / action tracker | Open Findings, action status, ownership, quota usage, feedback, and audit metadata may be retained for governance. | Supports report ownership, score history, and review traceability. | Implemented / evolving |
| SOC 2 roadmap | AI2COE is not claiming SOC 2 Type II certification unless and until an audit is completed. | Keeps enterprise security posture honest. | Roadmap / not yet certified |
| Cloud hardening | Production hardening, monitoring, backups, and customer-specific security review are evaluated by engagement scope. | Supports enterprise readiness without overclaiming maturity. | Roadmap / customer review |
Diagnostic uploads should use the Industrial IQ upload workflow or scoped pilot process. General inquiry forms and chat should not receive private operational data. Buyers remain responsible for export approval, internal classification, and reviewer assignment.
The low-risk diagnostic path starts from exported operational data. Customer-specific integration requirements, if any, require separate enterprise review.
No. Industrial IQ does not perform ERP write-back, autonomous remediation, blind merge, automatic deletion, or uncontrolled master-data change.
Uploaded source files are processed to generate the diagnostic report pack and then purged. Summary metrics, Open Findings, report ownership, quota usage, feedback, and audit metadata may be retained for governance.
Findings are routed to human review. Accountable owners approve, reject, defer, or escalate findings before any operational action is considered.
Sample and engagement-specific outputs may include reports, evidence tables, action queues, and exported artifacts depending on plan and scope.
Yes. The founder-led pilot is designed to begin with exported CSV/workbook data and no production-system write-back.
Yes. Use this security brief, Data Retention, DPA, SLA, and Trust Center pages as the first review pack. Customer-specific security review can be addressed during engagement scoping.
AI2COE does not claim SOC 2 Type II certification unless certified. Current maturity is described as pilot-ready with a security roadmap and buyer-specific review boundaries.
Inspect evidence, score, report, and action outputs before upload.
Enterprise evaluation assetUse the buyer committee, technical, procurement, and security review checklist.
Enterprise evaluation assetPrepare starter CSV structures for all eight Industrial IQ engines.
Enterprise evaluation assetReview hosting, access, retention, DPA, SLA, SOC 2 roadmap, and no-write-back controls.
Enterprise evaluation assetScope a low-risk diagnostic engagement before transformation spend.
Trust review gives security, procurement, legal, IT, and governance reviewers clear language before a diagnostic starts.
CISO, CIO, procurement, legal, risk, security, data governance, and enterprise architecture teams.
Hosting, access, data handling, retention, source-file purge, no ERP write-back, human review, DPA, SLA, and buyer-security review language.
A buyer-security review path that clarifies what Industrial IQ does, what it does not do, and what can be reviewed during procurement.
Read-only diagnostics, no ERP write-back, source-file purge after report generation, and human review before action.
Grounded in approved AI2COE content only. No unsupported claims.