Compatible with SAP  ·  IBM Maximo  ·  Oracle ERP  ·  Hexagon EAM  ·  Infor  ·  Any CMMS — Review data requirements →
Security Brief

Industrial IQ Security and Data Handling Brief.

A public security review brief for enterprise buyers evaluating Industrial IQ diagnostics, upload lifecycle, source-file purge, access control, DPA/SLA support, SOC 2 roadmap, and no-write-back boundaries.

Read-onlyNo ERP write-back
Source purgeAfter report generation
Human reviewBefore action
Executive takeaway

Trust and governance guide

Industrial IQ Security and Data Handling Brief: The Trust Center explains the control posture behind Industrial IQ so enterprise buyers can inspect data handling, review boundaries, and evidence discipline before adoption. Review Industrial IQ security, access, retention, DPA, SLA, SOC 2 roadmap, source-file purge, and no ERP write-back controls.

Review Trust Controls
Who should use itCISO, CIO, legal, procurement, governance, data owners, and executive sponsors evaluating diagnostic boundaries
Data requiredUpload lifecycle, authentication, retained metadata, report ownership, audit events, policy documents, and data-handling commitments.
Output producedA trust view of no ERP write-back, human review, confidence tiers, source-data handling, report ownership, and governance limits.
Best next stepReview the controls, then use Snapshot or sample reports to inspect the evidence model before private upload.
Security posture summary

Pilot-ready diagnostic controls with explicit enterprise boundaries.

Industrial IQ is designed for read-only diagnostic evaluation. The first enterprise step is exported operational data, not production integration or autonomous remediation. Enterprise production controls, data residency, certification posture, and procurement terms require customer-specific review.

Retention position: Uploaded source files are processed to generate the diagnostic report pack and then purged. Summary metrics, Open Findings, report ownership, quota usage, feedback, and audit metadata may be retained for governance.
Diagnostic data flow

Buyer source systems to owner-reviewed actions.

Buyer source systemsERP / EAM / CMMS / procurement / inventory
Exported fileCSV or workbook controlled by buyer
Industrial IQ uploadGoverned diagnostic path
Diagnostic processingMapped fields, evidence, confidence
Executive reportScore, assumptions, limitations, actions
Action trackerOwner review before operational action
No write-backBlocked path to ERP/EAM/CMMS changes
Security control summary

What enterprise reviewers should inspect.

Control areaCurrent postureBuyer valueStatus
No ERP write-backIndustrial IQ starts from exported data and does not change SAP, Maximo, Oracle, EAM, CMMS, procurement, or inventory systems.Reduces production-system change risk during diagnostic review.Implemented
Export-first diagnosticsBuyers can begin with CSV/workbook exports rather than production integration.Allows low-risk pilot evaluation before platform commitment.Implemented
Human reviewFindings are evidence for accountable owners to accept, reject, defer, or escalate.Prevents uncontrolled operational action.Implemented
Source-backed evidenceFindings include mapped fields, reason codes, source references, confidence, and report context.Supports finance, operations, procurement, maintenance, and audit review.Implemented
Access controlProtected workflows require authenticated account context; report ownership and access events are tracked.Supports reviewer accountability and report control.Implemented / review per engagement
Report ownershipReports are tied to generating user and business context where applicable.Clarifies who owns diagnostic evidence and follow-up.Implemented
Source-file purgeUploaded source files are processed to generate the diagnostic report pack and then purged.Reduces standing source-file retention.Implemented where diagnostic upload path applies
DPADPA language is available for diagnostic engagements and customer-specific review.Supports legal and procurement due diligence.Available during buyer review
SLAEngagement SLA language is published for scoped diagnostic delivery.Supports procurement and finance review.Published
Audit trail / action trackerOpen Findings, action status, ownership, quota usage, feedback, and audit metadata may be retained for governance.Supports report ownership, score history, and review traceability.Implemented / evolving
SOC 2 roadmapAI2COE is not claiming SOC 2 Type II certification unless and until an audit is completed.Keeps enterprise security posture honest.Roadmap / not yet certified
Cloud hardeningProduction hardening, monitoring, backups, and customer-specific security review are evaluated by engagement scope.Supports enterprise readiness without overclaiming maturity.Roadmap / customer review
Buyer responsibilities

Use the governed upload path and keep private data out of general forms.

Diagnostic uploads should use the Industrial IQ upload workflow or scoped pilot process. General inquiry forms and chat should not receive private operational data. Buyers remain responsible for export approval, internal classification, and reviewer assignment.

Current maturity status
Pilot-readyFounder-led diagnostics and public trust documentation are available.
RoadmapSOC 2 Type II, expanded monitoring, deployment hardening, and customer-specific reviews remain roadmap or engagement-specific items.
BoundaryCertification, penetration-test, and production-readiness claims are published only when documented.
Security FAQ

Questions CISO, legal, procurement, and CIO teams ask first.

Does AI2COE connect directly to ERP?

The low-risk diagnostic path starts from exported operational data. Customer-specific integration requirements, if any, require separate enterprise review.

Does Industrial IQ write back to ERP?

No. Industrial IQ does not perform ERP write-back, autonomous remediation, blind merge, automatic deletion, or uncontrolled master-data change.

What happens to uploaded files?

Uploaded source files are processed to generate the diagnostic report pack and then purged. Summary metrics, Open Findings, report ownership, quota usage, feedback, and audit metadata may be retained for governance.

Who reviews findings?

Findings are routed to human review. Accountable owners approve, reject, defer, or escalate findings before any operational action is considered.

Can findings be exported?

Sample and engagement-specific outputs may include reports, evidence tables, action queues, and exported artifacts depending on plan and scope.

Can we run a pilot without production integration?

Yes. The founder-led pilot is designed to begin with exported CSV/workbook data and no production-system write-back.

Can our CISO review the controls?

Yes. Use this security brief, Data Retention, DPA, SLA, and Trust Center pages as the first review pack. Customer-specific security review can be addressed during engagement scoping.

What certifications are currently available?

AI2COE does not claim SOC 2 Type II certification unless certified. Current maturity is described as pilot-ready with a security roadmap and buyer-specific review boundaries.

Evaluation assets

Proof, templates, trust, and pilot paths for serious buyers.

AI2COE Copilot