A non-customer illustrative scenario showing how Industrial IQ evaluates duplicate MRO records, confidence tiers, and owner actions from exported catalog data.
A multi-site operator suspects duplicate spare-parts records are splitting inventory, demand history, and procurement visibility across plants.
| Finding | Illustrative interpretation |
|---|---|
| Likely duplicate family | Three records share MPN evidence but differ by site-specific description. |
| UOM conflict | Two records appear similar but use different commercial units and require owner review. |
| High-value review queue | Duplicate candidates above the value threshold are routed to finance and materials owners. |
Duplicate catalog risk can inflate working capital, create false stockouts, and make ERP cleanup look broader than it needs to be.
No ERP write-back. Source files purged after report generation. Human review before action. Summary metrics and audit metadata may be retained for governance.
No. It is an illustrative diagnostic scenario for buyer evaluation and does not use customer data or customer claims.
Industrial IQ replaces sample findings with uploaded-data evidence, confidence tiers, scores, reports, and action ownership.
No. It produces evidence for human review and does not change ERP, EAM, CMMS, procurement, inventory, or maintenance systems.
Resource review reduces friction: what data is needed, how reports look, how evidence is reviewed, and which route the buyer can take next.
Implementation leads, buyer committees, data owners, procurement reviewers, and product champions.
Required fields, CSV templates, user manuals, buyer guides, sample reports, diagnostic scenarios, and trust controls.
A prepared evaluation path that leads to sample proof, data templates, upload, or a scoped diagnostic discussion.
Read-only diagnostics, no ERP write-back, source-file purge after report generation, and human review before action.