How should reviewers use Governance Backlog Prioritization?
Use Governance Backlog Prioritization as a governed reference term, then check the source records, confidence tier, and owner review state before treating it as operational evidence.
What must be reviewed before Governance Backlog Prioritization becomes evidence?
Relevant records include: Use case, source, owner, evidence class, confidence tier, authority level, reviewer, approval, exception, incident, and audit event. The reviewer must also check source context, field meaning, and the stated ambiguity before action.
What ambiguity should reviewers check for Governance Backlog Prioritization?
Governance readiness is not certification or permission to automate; it is evidence that ownership, controls, and review boundaries are defined.
Which Industrial IQ engine owns the primary relationship?
GovernanceMind AI is the primary engine. Supporting engines are used only when their evidence is substantively relevant: ReadyMind AI.
What is outside the scope of this definition?
This definition describes a governed diagnostic concept. AI2COE does not treat it as a benchmark result, buyer-specific outcome evidence, certification, autonomous instruction, promised outcome, or ERP write-back action.