How should reviewers use False Stockout?
Use False Stockout as a governed reference term, then check the source records, confidence tier, and owner review state before treating it as operational evidence.
What must be reviewed before False Stockout becomes evidence?
Relevant records include: Material or item ID, description, manufacturer, MPN, quantity, plant, storeroom, stock status, reservation status, quality status, movement history, asset or work-order reference, and purchase history where available. The reviewer must also check source context, field meaning, and the stated ambiguity before action.
What ambiguity should reviewers check for False Stockout?
A false-stockout candidate is not proof that stock was usable, interchangeable, released, or available at the required site. Physical condition, criticality, site constraints, and owner review remain decisive.
Which Industrial IQ engine owns the primary relationship?
InventoryMind AI is the primary engine. Supporting engines are used only when their evidence is substantively relevant: PartsCleanse AI.
What is outside the scope of this definition?
AI2COE identifies false-stockout candidates for owner review. It does not confirm physical availability, approve substitution, move inventory, change min-max rules, or write back to ERP, EAM, or CMMS systems.