How should reviewers use AI-Native ERP?
Use AI-Native ERP as a governed reference term, then check the source records, confidence tier, and owner review state before treating it as operational evidence.
What must be reviewed before AI-Native ERP becomes evidence?
Relevant records include: ERP modules, workflow definitions, source objects, process owners, authorization model, audit events, exception patterns, and integration boundaries. The reviewer must also check source context, field meaning, and the stated ambiguity before action.
What ambiguity should reviewers check for AI-Native ERP?
AI-native ERP does not mean a company is ready to use AI safely, and it does not remove the need for data-quality and owner-review evidence.
Which Industrial IQ engine owns the primary relationship?
ReadyMind AI is the primary engine. Supporting engines are used only when their evidence is substantively relevant: GovernanceMind AI.
What is outside the scope of this definition?
The glossary term does not claim AI2COE is a live AI-native ERP suite or that any ERP vendor's AI architecture is sufficient without source-data review.