How should reviewers use AI ERP Quality Release Review?
Use AI ERP Quality Release Review as a governed reference term, then check the source records, confidence tier, and owner review state before treating it as operational evidence.
What must be reviewed before AI ERP Quality Release Review becomes evidence?
Relevant records include: ERP module, country, entity, source object, field list, owner, approval state, source evidence, limitation, denied action, and audit metadata. The reviewer must also check source context, field meaning, and the stated ambiguity before action.
What ambiguity should reviewers check for AI ERP Quality Release Review?
AI ERP Quality Release Review does not prove customer outcome, benchmark performance, certification, local compliance, or autonomous ERP authority.
Which Industrial IQ engine owns the primary relationship?
GovernanceMind AI is the primary engine. Supporting engines are used only when their evidence is substantively relevant: ReadyMind AI.
What is outside the scope of this definition?
This glossary entity is a public definition for AI ERP evaluation. It does not authorize source-system writes, statutory filings, payment approval, master-data changes, autonomous remediation, or production transaction authority.