Authenticated users see review queues for lower-confidence or high-impact findings. Public preview mode shows the governance model without exposing private diagnostics.
Industrial IQ Security Governance: This Industrial IQ capability guide explains the operating question, evidence model, review boundary, and next action for the relevant platform workflow. Industrial IQ Security Governance for AI2COE Industrial IQ diagnostics: evidence, review, action, score history, and governance without ERP write-back.
Run Free Industrial IQ SnapshotIndustrial IQ keeps sample mode, uploaded-data mode, confidence tiers, evidence rows, report outputs, actions, score history, and governance status connected in one portal. Private records require account login.
Industrial IQ is not finished when a diagnostic score appears. The buyer still needs accountable review, evidence ownership, data-quality context, and a safe path from finding to decision. This public preview explains that operating model without exposing private diagnostic records.
The review queue is where confidence, evidence quality, and accountable ownership come together. Industrial IQ keeps lower-confidence or high-impact findings in a controlled review path so the buyer can validate source rows, inspect assumptions, and decide the next step. The queue is designed for enterprise accountability: no blind merge, no automatic deletion, no autonomous supplier action, and no ERP write-back.
Confirms diagnostic evidence remains read-only and that private run data is protected behind authenticated access.
Reviews no-write-back boundaries before any system owner considers downstream master-data change.
Accepts, rejects, or defers findings based on confidence tier, source-row evidence, and impact priority.
Uses reviewer notes, status history, and source context to understand why an action was approved or rejected.
| Layer | Behavior |
|---|---|
| No ERP write-back | Industrial IQ does not autonomously change SAP, Maximo, Oracle, EAM, CMMS, procurement, or inventory systems. |
| Human review | Findings can be accepted, rejected, assigned, or marked as needing more source data. |
| Evidence traceability | Each finding carries source fields, reason codes, confidence, assumptions, and limitations. |
| Audit status | Review notes, reviewer, update time, and action status become part of the diagnostic record. |