SAP / Maximo Lead documentation for business pressure, relevant engines, KPI impact, ROI levers, report output, internal questions, evidence required, and recurring value.
SAP / Maximo Lead cares about material master quality, export completeness, mapping readiness, and governance evidence. Industrial IQ shows evidence, score movement, report-ready assumptions, and actions that can be reviewed internally.
| Role-specific value | Documentation |
|---|---|
| Pain | material master quality, export completeness, mapping readiness, and governance evidence |
| Evidence Needed | source export, required fields, mapped columns, evidence rows, confidence tier, assumptions, limitations |
| Relevant Engine | ReadyMind AI, PartsCleanse AI, GovernanceMind AI |
| Report Output | ERP Data Readiness Report |
| ROI Lever | migration readiness, data quality, evidence traceability |
| Recommended Action | Run the relevant Industrial IQ diagnostic, review evidence, assign owners, and repeat monthly or quarterly. |
ERP data quality, governance readiness, operational readiness, and first-use-case recommendation.
Open documentationMRO catalog deduplication, field quality, UOM consistency, and duplicate capital exposure.
Open documentationEvidence traceability, confidence tiering, human review, auditability, and no-write-back governance.
Open documentation| Problem solved | Turns an operational data question into source-backed diagnostic evidence. |
|---|---|
| Who cares | CFO, COO, CIO, procurement, maintenance, reliability, ERP, governance, and board stakeholders where relevant. |
| Data needed | CSV exports with stable IDs, descriptions, quantities, values, dates, site, asset, supplier, and owner context where available. |
| Output delivered | Scores, evidence table, confidence tiers, executive report, action tracker items, score history, and governance status. |
| Value quantified | Working capital, carrying cost, emergency premium, dead stock, stockout risk, readiness gaps, or governance risk depending on diagnostic intent. |
| Decision supported | Whether to act, review, normalize data, escalate findings, fund remediation, or repeat the diagnostic cadence. |
| Report shared internally | Executive, CFO, procurement, inventory, readiness, governance, or renewal value report. |
| Recurring value | Baseline score -> re-upload -> score movement -> action closure -> benchmark comparison -> renewal value report. |
| Assumptions and limitations | Benchmarks and estimates remain planning context until customer-specific uploaded data is analyzed and reviewed. |
| Trust controls | No ERP write-back, evidence traceability, confidence tiers, human review, false-positive control, audit trail, and data-retention boundaries. |
Grounded in approved AI2COE content only. No unsupported claims.