How this diagnostic works for an ICP.
| Business problem | ERP data quality, governance readiness, operational readiness, and first-use-case recommendation. |
|---|---|
| Buyer owner | CIO, CTO, COO, Data Governance, and AI Transformation leaders |
| Trigger event | ERP readiness review, first AI use case selection, migration readiness, export completeness, or data quality governance pressure. |
| Input data required | Description |
| Optional fields | Material Id, Asset Id, Quantity, Unit Cost, Supplier, Site, Owner, Approval Status, Last Updated |
| Upload workflow | Upload -> Validate -> Analyze -> Evidence -> Score -> Report -> Action -> Repeat |
| Column mapping | Industrial IQ profiles source-fit, suggests field matches, asks the user to normalize unmapped required fields, then recalculates mapping readiness before the engine runs. |
| Evidence generated | Source-backed evidence rows, reason codes, confidence tiers, review status, assumptions, limitations, and action-owner context. |
| Score output | AI readiness score |
| Report output | ReadyMind AI AI Readiness Report |
| Confidence tiers | High-confidence findings can move to review; weak or unsafe matches stay in human-review queues. |
| Recurring use case | Monthly or quarterly re-uploads create score history, action progress, benchmark comparison, and renewal value reporting. |
Minimum viable upload and best upload.
| Engine | Required Data File | Required Fields | Optional Fields | Output Generated | Minimum Viable Upload | Best Upload |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ReadyMind AI | ERP export sample | Description | Material Id, Asset Id, Quantity, Unit Cost, Supplier, Site | AI readiness score, evidence, report, actions, score history | Description | Required fields plus site, value, date, owner, asset, supplier, and criticality context where available. |
What this engine analyzes.
- ERP data quality, data freshness, owner accountability, governance readiness, and first-use-case recommendation.
- Field completeness, consistency, duplicate-rate, site context, valuation, and review workflow scoring.
- ERP/AI readiness output that labels what is proven, missing, assumed, and blocked.
How the engine matures after the first run.
- ERP-specific readiness pack for SAP, Maximo, Oracle, Infor, Hexagon EAM, and CMMS exports.
- Transformation risk register and first-use-case sequencing across PartsCleanse, InventoryMind, ProcureMind, and ReadyMind.
- AI adoption roadmap grounded in uploaded-data readiness instead of generic AI maturity claims.
- Industry benchmark comparison for data, ERP, governance, and AI readiness.
- Transformation sequencing engine with budget, risk, and data-readiness gates.
- Recurring readiness trend for quarterly steering committees.
How to read the output.
ReadyMind AI AI Readiness Report includes AI readiness score, evidence records, confidence tiers, assumptions, limitations, action tracker items, score history, and no-write-back governance language.
How this connects to AI2COE Industrial IQ
AI Readiness Intelligence is not treated as an isolated content topic. Industrial IQ connects it to uploaded data, engine evidence, confidence tiers, executive reports, actions, score history, and governance review.
ReadyMind AI Documentation buyer enablement checklist.
| Problem solved | Turns an operational data question into source-backed diagnostic evidence. |
|---|---|
| Who cares | CFO, COO, CIO, procurement, maintenance, reliability, ERP, governance, and board stakeholders where relevant. |
| Data needed | CSV exports with stable IDs, descriptions, quantities, values, dates, site, asset, supplier, and owner context where available. |
| Output delivered | Scores, evidence table, confidence tiers, executive report, action tracker items, score history, and governance status. |
| Value quantified | Working capital, carrying cost, emergency premium, dead stock, stockout risk, readiness gaps, or governance risk depending on diagnostic intent. |
| Decision supported | Whether to act, review, normalize data, escalate findings, fund remediation, or repeat the diagnostic cadence. |
| Report shared internally | Executive, CFO, procurement, inventory, readiness, governance, or renewal value report. |
| Recurring value | Baseline score -> re-upload -> score movement -> action closure -> benchmark comparison -> renewal value report. |
| Assumptions and limitations | Benchmarks and estimates remain planning context until customer-specific uploaded data is analyzed and reviewed. |
| Trust controls | No ERP write-back, evidence traceability, confidence tiers, human review, false-positive control, audit trail, and data-retention boundaries. |