Works from CSV or workbook exports produced from SAP, IBM Maximo, Oracle ERP, Hexagon EAM, Infor, and other ERP, EAM, or CMMS systems. No direct integration or write-back is required — Review data requirements →
Industrial IQ documentation

Methodology

Methodology documentation for AI2COE Industrial IQ buyers, operators, data owners, executives, and governance teams.

Run Free Industrial IQ SnapshotRequired Data by EngineDocs Home
8Engines
18Industry guides
0ERP write-back
Evidence summary

Industrial IQ documentation

Methodology: The Industrial IQ documentation center explains source exports, field mapping, report interpretation, no-write-back controls, data lifecycle, and safe next steps for diagnostic adoption. Methodology documentation for AI2COE Industrial IQ buyers, operators, data owners, executives, and governance teams.

View Required Fields
Review ownerEnterprise evaluators, implementation teams, product champions, and technical reviewers
Input file contextThe documented data files, required fields, optional fields, mapping rules, assumptions, and report artifacts.
Diagnostic evidenceA practical adoption guide that explains how Industrial IQ is used, what it produces, and how recurring value is created.
Recommended actionReview required fields, then start with a sample or uploaded-data Industrial IQ Snapshot.
Executive decision context

Methodology

Industrial IQ methodology explains what is measured, what evidence is used, how scores are interpreted, and what is not claimed.

This guide explains what problem is solved, who cares, what data is needed, what output is delivered, what value lever is affected, what report can be shared internally, and what recurring value is created.

UploadCSV export or sample dataset
Source FitRequired fields and data quality
AI MatchColumn aliases and confidence
NormalizeCanonical field preparation
DiagnoseEngine logic and evidence
ReportScore, actions, assumptions
RepeatScore history and renewal value
Required data by engine

Use this table before upload.

EngineRequired Data FileRequired FieldsOptional FieldsOutput GeneratedMinimum Viable UploadBest Upload
PartsCleanse AI Material or item master CSV Description Material Id, Manufacturer, Mpn, Supplier, Uom, Quantity Catalog health score, evidence, report, actions, score history Description Required fields plus site, value, date, owner, asset, supplier, and criticality context where available.
InventoryMind AI Inventory balance CSV Material Id, Quantity Description, Unit Cost, Stock Value, Last Movement Date, Movement Qty, Demand Inventory health score, evidence, report, actions, score history Material Id, Quantity Required fields plus site, value, date, owner, asset, supplier, and criticality context where available.
ProcureMind AI Purchase order CSV Po Number, Description Material Id, Supplier, Unit Price, Quantity, Order Date, Order Type Procurement leakage score, evidence, report, actions, score history Po Number, Description Required fields plus site, value, date, owner, asset, supplier, and criticality context where available.
FinanceMind AI Inventory value file Material Id, Stock Value Description, Quantity, Unit Cost, Duplicate Family, Carrying Cost Rate, Emergency Premium Working capital score, evidence, report, actions, score history Material Id, Stock Value Required fields plus site, value, date, owner, asset, supplier, and criticality context where available.
Accepted CSV format

Prepare clean exports before upload.

Use UTF-8 CSV with one header row, one operational record per row, stable identifiers, ISO-style dates where available, numeric values without currency symbols, and separate columns for site, supplier, asset, quantity, value, and owner context.

Common errors: merged header rows, hidden subtotal rows, mixed currencies in one value column, duplicate column names, free-text dates, missing material or asset identifiers, and supplier names embedded inside descriptions.

If fields are missing: Industrial IQ still profiles source fit, but unmapped required fields reduce the AI Match Score, Mapping Readiness Score, diagnostic confidence, and report completeness until the user normalizes the data.

Sample row examples

Minimum viable row patterns.

  • Catalog Intelligence: Description: 6205-2RS bearing sealed SKF
  • Inventory Risk Intelligence: Material Id: MAT-100245 | Quantity: 42
  • Procurement Leakage Intelligence: Po Number: PO_NUMBER | Description: 6205-2RS bearing sealed SKF
  • Working Capital Intelligence: Material Id: MAT-100245 | Stock Value: 1850.00
Related engines

Which diagnostic should the buyer run next?

Related engine

PartsCleanse AI

MRO catalog deduplication, field quality, UOM consistency, and duplicate capital exposure.

Open documentation
Related engine

InventoryMind AI

Dead stock, slow-moving stock, excess, stockout risk, and duplicated stock exposure.

Open documentation
Related engine

ProcureMind AI

Emergency procurement, stocked-but-purchased events, repeated buys, supplier alias risk, and price variance.

Open documentation
Related engine

FinanceMind AI

Duplicate capital exposure, carrying cost, emergency premium, and recoverable value scenarios.

Open documentation
Report anatomy

What the buyer can share internally.

Industrial IQ reports include scope, source-fit score, AI match score, mapping readiness, diagnostic confidence, score components, evidence records, assumptions, limitations, review requirements, action items, and recurring score history.

MethodologyValue lever
Uploaded dataCustomer-specific diagnostic required
FinanceMind AIRelated diagnostic engine
EstimateAssumption-labeled until reviewed
Benchmark assumptionUploaded evidenceConfidence tierHuman reviewReportable value
Buyer Enablement Validation

Methodology buyer enablement checklist.

Problem solvedTurns an operational data question into source-backed diagnostic evidence.
Who caresCFO, COO, CIO, procurement, maintenance, reliability, ERP, governance, and board stakeholders where relevant.
Data neededCSV exports with stable IDs, descriptions, quantities, values, dates, site, asset, supplier, and owner context where available.
Output deliveredScores, evidence table, confidence tiers, executive report, action tracker items, score history, and governance status.
Value quantifiedWorking capital, carrying cost, emergency premium, dead stock, stockout risk, readiness gaps, or governance risk depending on diagnostic intent.
Decision supportedWhether to act, review, normalize data, escalate findings, fund remediation, or repeat the diagnostic cadence.
Report shared internallyExecutive, CFO, procurement, inventory, readiness, governance, or renewal value report.
Recurring valueBaseline score -> re-upload -> score movement -> action closure -> benchmark comparison -> renewal value report.
Assumptions and limitationsBenchmarks and estimates remain planning context until customer-specific uploaded data is analyzed and reviewed.
Trust controlsNo ERP write-back, evidence traceability, confidence tiers, human review, false-positive control, audit trail, and data-retention boundaries.
Run Free Industrial IQ Snapshot View Required Data by Engine Review Trust Controls
Evaluation resource map

Turn documentation into a guided evaluation path.

Resources and docs should help reviewers move from methodology to templates, proof format, trust review, and pilot decision without hunting through long text blocks.

Download Data Templates
Methodology

Research and framework pages define terms, readiness pillars, and evidence boundaries.

 Required fields

Data templates clarify the source files and fields each diagnostic engine can evaluate.

 Sample outputs

Sample reports show how evidence, scores, confidence tiers, and open findings are presented.

 Review controls

Trust pages explain no ERP write-back, source-file handling, human review, and procurement review language.

AI2COE Copilot