Works from CSV or workbook exports produced from SAP, IBM Maximo, Oracle ERP, Hexagon EAM, Infor, and other ERP, EAM, or CMMS systems. No direct integration or write-back is required — Review data requirements →
Safe Claims Registry

Every public claim should say what kind of evidence supports it.

This registry protects buyer trust by making AI2COE language auditable. It tells executives, procurement, CIOs, and AI search systems how to interpret numbers, controls, product outputs, and roadmap statements.

5 classesClaim evidence types
Audit-readySource page per claim
No ambiguityBoundary stated
Benchmark Useful for early discussion, but must say it is an assumption.
Calculator Useful for lead capture and CFO sizing, but not an audit finding.
Diagnostic Stronger evidence because it uses uploaded catalog data and report logic.
Control A product behavior or governance posture, such as no write-back or source purge.
Roadmap Future or controlled-beta capability; must not be sold as current production scope.
Claims registry

Current public claims and their interpretation boundary.

ClaimEvidence classSource surfaceBoundary language
Duplicate-rate planning assumption Estimated input MRO planning-assumption methodology Use for initial sizing only; actual reports replace this with uploaded-data findings.
Material exposure band on 50K-SKU scenarios Planning assumption Scorecard and methodology Planning range based on stated assumptions; not a customer guarantee.
50K SKU sample-mode runtime Engine validation evidence Engine validation boundary Public performance language should stay tied to controlled sample conditions and not imply customer-specific runtime.
No ERP write-back Platform control Data handling and trust center Product posture: diagnostic evidence only; client owners control ERP remediation.
Source catalog purge Data lifecycle control Data handling commitment Uploaded source files are processed and purged after report generation.
Browser, Excel, Word, PDF, CSV outputs Report capability Report gallery Available output types depend on the active run/session policy.
Free diagnostic runs Commercial policy Pricing Subject to current quota and account policy shown in the portal.
ReliabilityMind AI and ProcureMind AI Diagnostic engines Products Position as evidence-first diagnostics with role-specific readiness and procurement leakage outputs.
Why this matters

Enterprise authority comes from being specific about proof.

A buyer can accept a benchmark if it is labelled as a benchmark. They lose trust when a benchmark is made to sound like a customer-specific outcome. AI2COE should keep this registry current as the product earns more live evidence.

Operating rule: use this registry before publishing new landing pages, competitor pages, emails, reports, or sales collateral.
Executive review lens

Use this page to decide the next evidence step.

Industrial IQ pages are designed to move enterprise buyers from operating pain to source-backed diagnostic evidence, not to force an immediate platform commitment.

Audience

Finance, operations, procurement, maintenance, reliability, ERP/data, security, and executive sponsors.

Evidence to prepare

Relevant ERP, EAM, CMMS, inventory, procurement, asset, work-order, or readiness exports where available.

Output

A diagnostic route, sample proof format, report evidence, confidence tier, owner review path, or commercial next step.

Trust boundary

Read-only diagnostics, no ERP write-back, source-file purge after report generation, and human review before action.