Working capital score
Use the score as a diagnostic signal that needs evidence review.
Industrial IQ | AI2COE | FinanceMind AI
FinanceMind AI Working Capital Report
Report takeaway
What this sample report answers
FinanceMind AI Sample Report shows how AI2COE Industrial IQ turns sample operational data into evidence rows, confidence tiers, score output, actions, report value, and governance controls. Sample results prove workflow and output structure; uploaded customer data is required for customer-specific findings.
Sample boundary: private source files are not required to view this sample. In live diagnostics, uploaded source files are used to generate report packs and then purged.
Review owner
Enterprise buyers inspecting report quality before uploading private operational data.
Input files
Engine-specific operational CSV exports or deterministic AI2COE sample data.
Diagnostic evidence
Evidence, scores, assumptions, limitations, actions, and governance status.
Next action
Sample report output map
How to evaluate the Working Capital Intelligence output bundle
This visual map helps buyers trace the sample report as a product output: source file, field mapping, evidence rows, confidence context, report pack, and governed owner action stay connected before any private upload.
stock value, duplicate exposure, carrying-cost assumption
Inspect source context, confidence, assumptions, and limits.
FinanceMind AI Working Capital Report
Use HTML and PDF views for buyer committee review.
Owner, status, next review
Keep remediation buyer-controlled after the sample is replaced with uploaded data.
Baseline and rerun movement
Use recurring reviews to see what changed after accepted actions.
CSV, mapping, data dictionary
Give data owners the field expectations before private upload.
Output boundary: this sample proves output structure and workflow only. Uploaded operational data is required before customer-specific findings can be reviewed.
Evaluation kit
Download the supporting assets for this Working Capital Intelligence sample.
Use the HTML sample to inspect report structure, then use the supporting files to understand what data owners would prepare before replacing sample assumptions with uploaded-data evidence.
PDF
Offline review artifact for buyer committees.
Sample CSVDeterministic sample input used for testing the workflow.
MappingColumn mapping guide for source-fit review.
DictionaryField definitions and expected diagnostic meaning.
Product pageReview the Working Capital Intelligence engine page.
Trust boundary: sample assets are deterministic demonstration files. Live diagnostics remain read-only, require owner review before action, and do not write back to ERP/EAM/CMMS systems.
Executive Summary
43.0Working capital score
Material RiskRisk level
Medium ConfidenceConfidence
31Evidence records
Source mode: Sample dataset result. Sample results demonstrate workflow and report structure; uploaded-data results replace assumptions with customer source evidence.
Score interpretation: Lower health or readiness scores indicate higher unresolved exposure, weaker readiness, or stronger review need. Scores are deterministic and derived from mapped source fields, findings, evidence, and component inputs.
Executive interpretation: Focus on asset integrity, turnaround readiness, working capital exposure, and audit-safe ERP preparation.
Report delivery and governance controls
Email
Report email path
Authenticated Industrial IQ runs attempt branded report email delivery and retain delivery status in the platform report inventory.
Review
Human review required
Low-confidence or high-impact findings should be accepted, rejected, assigned, deferred, or marked needs-more-data before remediation.
ERP safety
No ERP write-back
Industrial IQ produces evidence and recommendations only. It does not autonomously change SAP, Maximo, Oracle, EAM, CMMS, procurement, inventory, or asset records.
Data handling: Uploaded source files are processed to generate the diagnostic report pack and then purged. Summary metrics and audit metadata may be retained for governance.
CFO command view
126463.4Capital exposure signal
15175.61-35409.75Recoverable range
22763.41Annual leakage signal
Material RiskBoard attention band
Diagnostic components
154200.0TOTAL INVENTORY VALUE
53970.0DUPLICATE CAPITAL AT RISK
33924.0CARRYING COST ESTIMATE
1.72EMERGENCY PREMIUM
10547.49ROI SCENARIO LOW
24610.8ROI SCENARIO HIGH
active_deterministic_evidence_engineDIAGNOSTIC DEPTH
2REQUIRED FIELDS MAPPED
Score formula: 100 - min(85, exposure/total_inventory_value*100) Random score used: False
| Score input | Value |
|---|---|
| total inventory value | 154200.0 |
| duplicate capital at risk | 53970.0 |
| carrying cost estimate | 33924.0 |
| emergency premium | 1.72 |
| roi scenario low | 10547.49 |
| roi scenario high | 24610.8 |
| required fields mapped | 2 |
| optional fields mapped | 8 |
| source rows profiled | 24 |
| estimated row value total | 154200.0 |
| financial rows without value | 0 |
| high value exposure rows | 1 |
| working capital signal | 33924.0 |
| recoverable value signal | 27756.0 |
| validation issue count | 0 |
| validation blocker count | 0 |
| prompt injection signal count | 0 |
Product maturity and competitive depth
Competitive position: Differentiates from MDM and optimization tools by translating operational findings into finance-governed, assumption-transparent decision evidence.
| Priority | Implemented product capability |
|---|---|
| P0 | Duplicate capital-at-risk, carrying cost, emergency premium, and exposure consolidation.; Finance assumptions panel: carrying-cost %, recoverable %, review acceptance %, emergency premium %, and limitation labels.; CFO report output that separates benchmark, estimate, uploaded-data result, and confidence tier. |
| P1 | ROI scenario builder, high-value exposure queue, board summary, and site financial concentration.; Value realization tracker: identified, reviewed, accepted, resolved, remaining.; Renewal value report tied to action completion and score movement. |
| P2 | Multi-site CFO cockpit with exposure trend, recovery assumptions, and audit-ready limitation notes.; Capital stewardship benchmark by industry and asset intensity.; Board-ready narrative pack for recurring intelligence renewal. |
ICP packaging
| Package | Engines | Decision supported |
|---|---|---|
| CFO Pack | FinanceMind AI, PartsCleanse AI, InventoryMind AI, ProcureMind AI | Fund value realization only after capital exposure, carrying cost, procurement leakage, and review confidence are visible. |
| Procurement Pack | ProcureMind AI, PartsCleanse AI, InventoryMind AI, FinanceMind AI | Convert supplier, PO, duplicate stock, and price-variance evidence into sourcing action without unsupported savings claims. |
| CISO / Legal Pack | GovernanceMind AI, ReadyMind AI, FinanceMind AI | Review no-write-back boundaries, source traceability, confidence tiers, limitation language, and audit evidence before industrial AI adoption expands. |
Advanced product insights
| Product output | Diagnostic value |
|---|---|
| finance assumptions | {"carrying_cost_percent": "22% default unless uploaded carrying_cost_rate is provided", "emergency_premium_percent": "8-15% unless uploaded premium field exists", "recoverable_percent_base": "18% after human review", "recoverable_percent_high": "28% after human review", "recoverable_percent_low": "12% after human review", "review_acceptance_percent": "60% default planning assumption; not a claim"} |
| value realization ledger | {"accepted": 0, "identified": 188124.0, "ledger_status": "Ready for recurring upload and action tracker updates.", "remaining": 188124.0, "resolved": 0, "reviewed": 0} |
| board summary model | {"headline": "Working-capital exposure requires review before value is claimed.", "not_claimed": "No savings are claimed until findings are accepted and resolved by the customer.", "proof_required": ["source value", "confidence tier", "owner review", "accepted action", "resolved status"]} |
| site financial concentration | [["Plant-4", 51450.0], ["Plant-3", 39600.0], ["Plant-2", 36750.0], ["Plant-1", 26400.0]] |
Buyer committee views
CFO
Can quantified exposure justify a diagnostic or remediation budget?
FinanceMind AI shows 126463.4 as the current capital or leakage signal before owner review.
Next question: Which findings have enough confidence and value to enter the financial business case?
COO
Which findings threaten operational continuity, site readiness, or uptime?
2 high-attention findings require operational owner review.
Next question: Which findings must be resolved before the next outage, shutdown, or planning cycle?
CIO
Is the data ready for governed AI without ERP write-back risk?
Industrial IQ produced evidence from exports only and did not change ERP, EAM, CMMS, or procurement systems.
Next question: Which missing fields or governance gaps should be fixed in the next export?
Procurement
Where do supplier, purchase, or stocked-but-purchased signals need review?
Procurement actions should be evidence-led and routed through human review before supplier action.
Next question: Which supplier or purchase findings are defensible enough for category review?
Maintenance
Will spare availability and catalog quality support maintenance execution?
Maintenance should use the evidence queue to protect planned work and critical assets.
Next question: Which findings block planned work, shutdown readiness, or critical equipment coverage?
Board
Is this risk material enough to fund recurring diagnostic intelligence?
The result is diagnostic evidence, not an autonomous system change or unsupported ROI claim.
Next question: Should leadership fund the next diagnostic cycle, review queue, or remediation scope?
Evidence graph
Model: Source Record -> Finding -> Evidence -> Confidence -> Business Impact -> Recommended Action -> Review Status -> Report -> Score History
37 nodes | 36 evidence relationships. This graph links uploaded source rows to findings, confidence, business impact, recommended actions, report output, and score history.
Renewal value view
126463.4EXPOSURE IDENTIFIED
4REVIEW QUEUE SIZE
4ACTIONS CREATED
0ACTIONS REVIEWED
10117.07CONSERVATIVE VALUE REALIZATION
20234.14BASE VALUE REALIZATION
monthly for high-risk sites; quarterly for controlled sitesNEXT REVIEW CADENCE
Recurring value interpretation: Compare this run against the next upload to show exposure reviewed, actions completed, score movement, and remaining risk.
Key Findings
Trust control: Each finding must be interpreted with its confidence, evidence count, mapped fields, and source records. Similar-looking industrial records may still require owner review before action.
| Analyzer | Finding | Severity | Confidence | Evidence | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duplicate Capital-at-Risk Estimator | 6 duplicate capital families identified | HIGH | 82% | 6 | Prioritize the top duplicate-value families for CFO and materials review. |
| Carrying Cost Estimator | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | MEDIUM | 75% | 24 | Use carrying-cost exposure to build the board-level remediation case. |
| Emergency Procurement Premium Estimator | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | MEDIUM | 72% | 24 | Connect emergency premium rows to ProcureMind and validate root causes. |
| Exposure Consolidation Engine | 1 rows concentrate working-capital exposure | HIGH | 82% | 1 | Prioritize high-value rows in the CFO working-capital review and tie actions to owner-approved recovery assumptions. |
Evidence Records
| ID | Confidence tier | Severity | Description | Value | Source | Reason codes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-1e2a93f6 | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 6 duplicate capital families identified | 8775.0 | row:7:MAT-001-007 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-40fb5167 | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 6 duplicate capital families identified | 8800.0 | row:14:MAT-002-014 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-879b7602 | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 6 duplicate capital families identified | 11025.0 | row:15:MAT-003-015 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-7cbd8e82 | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 6 duplicate capital families identified | 10800.0 | row:22:MAT-004-022 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-fe7b1efd | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 6 duplicate capital families identified | 13275.0 | row:23:MAT-005-023 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-f1502827 | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 6 duplicate capital families identified | 6800.0 | row:6:MAT-000-006 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-edd08d1b | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 2920.5 | row:23:MAT-005-023 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-62214573 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 2425.5 | row:15:MAT-003-015 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-c882a1c4 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 2376.0 | row:22:MAT-004-022 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-5e4d8786 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 2271.5 | row:5:MAT-005-005 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-76a04dd6 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1936.0 | row:14:MAT-002-014 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-e2b89e17 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1930.5 | row:7:MAT-001-007 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-947007fb | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1886.5 | row:21:MAT-003-021 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-a8660e94 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1782.0 | row:4:MAT-004-004 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-d5194a43 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1622.5 | row:11:MAT-005-011 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-c0cbb428 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1501.5 | row:13:MAT-001-013 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-f6779c4f | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1496.0 | row:6:MAT-000-006 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-94e29caf | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Annual carrying-cost leakage signal calculated | 1452.0 | row:20:MAT-002-020 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-8791d112 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.18 | row:6:MAT-000-006 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-51aa99b8 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.18 | row:12:MAT-000-012 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-08d53230 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.18 | row:18:MAT-000-018 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-6dc10fa8 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.18 | row:24:MAT-000-024 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-cf1e2a6c | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:1:MAT-001-001 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-66b88f61 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:7:MAT-001-007 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-c438a315 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:13:MAT-001-013 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-68adcf85 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:19:MAT-001-019 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-bf00b49d | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:2:MAT-002-002 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-22f8b654 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:8:MAT-002-008 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-0d61deda | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:14:MAT-002-014 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-e4bbab00 | Medium Confidence | MEDIUM | Emergency procurement premium signal provided | 0.05 | row:20:MAT-002-020 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
| E-900ae39f | Medium Confidence | HIGH | 1 rows concentrate working-capital exposure | 13275.0 | row:23:MAT-005-023 | material-id-present, description-signature, site-context, value-bearing-row, spec-token-match |
Recommended Actions
P0
Prioritize the top duplicate-value families for CFO and materials review.
Owner: CFO | Due: 30 days
P1
Use carrying-cost exposure to build the board-level remediation case.
Owner: CFO | Due: 60 days
P0
Prioritize high-value rows in the CFO working-capital review and tie actions to owner-approved recovery assumptions.
Owner: CFO | Due: 30 days
P1
Connect emergency premium rows to ProcureMind and validate root causes.
Owner: CFO | Due: 60 days
Mapping and validation
| Input | Source column | Completeness | Confidence | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| material_id | material_id | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| stock_value | stock_value | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| description | description | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| quantity | quantity | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| unit_cost | unit_cost | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| duplicate_family | duplicate_family | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| carrying_cost_rate | carrying_cost_rate | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| emergency_premium | emergency_premium | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| site | site | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
| currency | currency | 100.0% | 100.0% | Exact ERP alias |
Source fit, AI match, and normalization
100%Source fit score
100.0%AI match score
100%Mapping readiness score
94.3%Diagnostic confidence score
Workbench interpretation: Source fit measures whether the uploaded file contains recognizable inputs. AI match measures column-mapping confidence. Diagnostic readiness measures whether the normalized mapped data can support trustworthy engine output.
| Quality signal | Value |
|---|---|
| source fit score | 100 |
| ai match score | 100.0 |
| diagnostic readiness score | 100 |
| required mapped | 2 |
| required total | 2 |
| optional mapped | 8 |
| optional total | 8 |
| required completeness | 100.0 |
| row count | 24 |
| column count | 33 |
| blockers | 0 |
| warnings | 0 |
| source fit band | Strong |
| ai match band | Strong |
| readiness band | Strong |
| diagnostic confidence score | 94.3 |
| diagnostic confidence band | Strong |
Normalization plan
| Engine field | Source column | Original sample | Normalized preview | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Material Id | material_id | MAT-001-001 | MAT-001-001 | Trim whitespace, preserve leading zeroes, normalize item/material identifiers, and keep original source reference. |
| Stock Value | stock_value | 2925 | 2925 | Parse extended value, apply currency context where available, and label missing valuation. |
| Description | description | Oil & Gas pump bearing seal kit model 1 stainless 4 inch | OIL & GAS PUMP BEARING SEAL KIT MODEL 1 STAINLESS 4 INCH | Normalize case, abbreviations, punctuation, industrial units, specification tokens, and obvious spacing noise. |
| Quantity | quantity | 3 | 3 | Parse numeric quantity, keep negatives for audit context, and separate blank/zero from missing. |
| Unit Cost | unit_cost | 975 | 975 | Parse unit cost, retain source currency, and separate uploaded value from benchmark assumption. |
| Duplicate Family | duplicate_family | FAM-001 | FAM-001 | Normalize blanks, trim source values, preserve original evidence, and label any assumptions before engine execution. |
| Carrying Cost Rate | carrying_cost_rate | 0.22 | 0.22 | Normalize blanks, trim source values, preserve original evidence, and label any assumptions before engine execution. |
| Emergency Premium | emergency_premium | 0.05 | 0.05 | Normalize blanks, trim source values, preserve original evidence, and label any assumptions before engine execution. |
| Site | site | Plant-2 | Plant-2 | Normalize plant, site, storeroom, facility, depot, or operating-unit labels. |
| Currency | currency | USD | USD | Normalize ISO currency code or use country/system assumption with visible limitation. |
Assumptions and limitations
Assumptions
- Uploaded data is treated as the source of truth for this diagnostic run.
- No ERP write-back is performed. Outputs are recommendations and evidence records only.
- Financial estimates use uploaded values where available and conservative assumptions otherwise.
- Industry language is adjusted for Oil & Gas: plants, wells, refineries, shutdowns, turnarounds, and asset integrity.
- Workbench scores were calculated before and after engine execution: source fit 100%, AI match 100.0%, mapping readiness 100%, diagnostic confidence 94.3%.
- Public sample report: deterministic AI2COE sample data was used. Replace with uploaded customer data for customer-specific findings.
Limitations
- Results are diagnostic signals, not final accounting entries.
- Low-confidence findings require human review before remediation.
- Missing source fields reduce confidence and may suppress some analyzers.
- Benchmarks are labelled assumptions unless validated by uploaded data.